Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (104560)	12/7/2000 5:04:24 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Assuming he does, would you accept him as a counter of those ballots? LoF

To: Dave Gore who wrote (104560)	12/7/2000 5:07:12 PM
From: alan w	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

If he does, should the entire country trust his judgement in divining someone's actions? What if someone changed their mind after starting to punch a chad? They left the booth with the chad still in place, thinking they did the right thing. But when someone got a hold of their ballot during a manual recount, they punched the chad out, completely disenfranchising someones vote. Bottom line, manual counting is extremely subjective. Machines show no favoritism. That's my only problem with your argument. Have a good one. alan w