Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: amadeus who wrote (104648)	12/7/2000 5:48:17 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 769667

Consistency? Try the difference between unsubstantiated allegations and proof positive. We know for a fact Clinton was abusing the intern staff. Anita Hill was a publicity seeking liar. JLA

To: amadeus who wrote (104648)	12/7/2000 5:59:15 PM
From: BG Smith	Respond to of 769667

"allegations of sexual harrassment. same as clarence thomas..." Yes, of course. I remember now how Clarence had that woman fired for not submitting. I will always be amazed that Clarence was able to skate when all those state troopers testified against him.

To: amadeus who wrote (104648)	12/7/2000 5:59:25 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769667

No suit was brought against Clarence Thomas, and I, for one, did not believe Anita Hill. Anyway, Clinton was not impeached for harassment......

To: amadeus who wrote (104648)	12/7/2000 6:04:52 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

You are getting creepy, imo. Just to freshen your memory. Clarence Thomas was alleged to have joked about a pubic hair to an adult colleague, and may have wanted her to date her. I believe there was only one witness and it regarded allegations from YEARS earlier. It also is her word against his, with no reason to believe one over another. Bill Clinton took advantage of an impressionable young person who was in love with him so he could shoot his load. Then he lied about it to a judge (perjury). Can you see the difference, or do you truly believe these situations are the same?