Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (5165)	12/8/2000 11:09:00 AM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 6710

But then there is the issue of the federal voting rights laws, which prohibit disenfranchising innocent voters due to the errors of others. First I've heard it put this way. But I haven't been following the Seminole case -- have had to travel off island twice this week. Has this argument been made in that case? If you know it offhand, what's the statutory basis? Would seem to be a basis for appeal to the USSC if this is really a federal voting rights issue. Back to the nine???

To: Ilaine who wrote (5165)	12/8/2000 11:09:00 AM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

But then there is the issue of the federal voting rights laws, which prohibit disenfranchising innocent voters due to the errors of others. First I've heard it put this way. But I haven't been following the Seminole case -- have had to travel off island twice this week. Has this argument been made in that case? If you know it offhand, what's the statutory basis? Would seem to be a basis for appeal to the USSC if this is really a federal voting rights issue. Back to the nine???