Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (105070)	12/8/2000 12:45:19 AM
From: alan w	Respond to of 769667

All that just to say some other state with different voting laws was different. Let me ask you something. Did Massachusetts change their standards midstream? alan w

To: Dave Gore who wrote (105070)	12/8/2000 12:52:50 AM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 769667

As I wrote, it was in a primary. Delahunt is now in Congress as a Democrat. Do you think out of 100 dimpled votes, that elderly, handicapped or a disabled veteran--who are the ones most likely to create dimples--should have their votes cast aside because of one or two or three clumsy undecided voters? Much like the Republicans who want their absentee ballots to count in Seminole and Martin County, so would the folks reference above like their votes to count. You'd risk disenfranchising those voters because of one or two or three clumsy undecideds, who when they saw they marked the ballot could have asked for a new one? My view, is you're not being fair to not count a dimple.