SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (81028)12/8/2000 3:43:59 AM
From: PhantomGremlin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
(OT) Douglas, "book value" is tricky. At least to me.

For example, Yahoo lists WCOM as selling at 0.77 of book value. However, drilling down a few screens shows WCOM selling at 5.35 times "tangible book".

I haven't read SEC filings on WCOM. But I suspect the difference between these to be a consequence of goodwill that WCOM must write off from mergers and/or acquisitions.

So in this case, which is the more realistic "book value"?

Similar situation probably applies to many oil stocks. Plus many E&Ps had to take writedowns during low oil prices. But I don't think they are allowed to "write up" those assets now.

Seems difficult to get an accurate assessment of what a company is actually worth.



To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (81028)12/8/2000 10:37:32 AM
From: BigBull  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 95453
 
OT So Doug, buying telcoms eh? They've got to be close to a bottom. Taking a look at LU yet? I still want to see some kind of basing action on these issues, but no question, there's "blood in the streets" on these puppies. Does anybody like them? I can't find too many. Let me know if you see a "Death of the network" headline will you? The Economist would be nice! <g>