SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Master (Hijacked) who wrote (105364)12/8/2000 10:35:54 AM
From: Mr. Whist  Respond to of 769670
 
Re: "So you believe computerized voting is the answer to your woes?"

Yes.



To: Master (Hijacked) who wrote (105364)12/8/2000 10:36:09 AM
From: H-Man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
There are some pretty good systems out there. One system, which uses touch screens, records the vote 3 times. First on a hard drive. 2nd on a diskette like module (not a floppy but a specialized device, readable only by specially designed machines) And third it records it on paper, similar to a cash register reciept, which is secured within the machine.

Anonymity is easy to maintain, a poll worker activates it for 1 ballot per voter.

Software security is easy to maintain as well, by securing and encrypting the code, and comparing the executable code before and after the election. The whole machine is to be secured when not in use.

These are really no different than we have today with many voting machines. we have leaver type machines here. Someone could get into the machine and rig it, but there are security measures which are easily implemented to prevent it.

Now, if you talk internet voting, there u have a point.

Being an expert in imaging and internet systems, I have already written my senator to expose the risks of internet voting.