Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Second_Titan who wrote (81083)	12/8/2000 3:29:48 PM
From: isopatch	Respond to of 95453

OT/LOL, Gimmie a break/eom

To: Second_Titan who wrote (81083)	12/8/2000 3:37:37 PM
From: chowder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

Hi Que! OT I don't think Nikki Clark's intelligence was in question. What was in question was her perceived political views and would she put them aside to do the right thing because it was the right thing to do. She proved that she could. Add my salute to her. The case was a frivolous case. Gore was seeking permission to gauge the "intent" of voters elsewhere. I couldn't imagine disqualifying votes that showed clear intent without voter fraud. Ms. Clark agreed. Another OT - My parents wouldn't vote a Republican into the Presidential office if you placed a gun to their head. I wouldn't vote a Democrat into the White House if you placed a gun to mine. Just because Ms. Clark's sister helped in the Bush campaign, it doesn't mean Ms. Clark's political views are similar. dabum