SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JBTFD who wrote (105763)12/8/2000 3:26:55 PM
From: Sedohr Nod  Respond to of 769670
 
Did you listen to ANY of the testimony at all?????



To: JBTFD who wrote (105763)12/8/2000 3:27:43 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
If you knew your facts, you'd know Bush overcame democrat party fraud to win fairly.



To: JBTFD who wrote (105763)12/8/2000 3:35:36 PM
From: penuts  Respond to of 769670
 
That is not the whole truth. Also, democratic ballots applications were not thrown out for the explicit reason of not having the voter id#. Democratic and Republican ballots applications were thrown out for proper reasons. If what you said was the whole thruth, the judges would not have said that the "integrity" of the ballots AND election were not put in jeopardy.



To: JBTFD who wrote (105763)12/8/2000 3:41:41 PM
From: Srexley  Respond to of 769670
 
You have your facts wrong, Mark. When you realize this maybe you will get mad that your party is playing you like a fool.

1) Repub ballot applications with a printer error were sent from the applicant to the elections office where the mistake was noticed.

2) Demo forms had the numbers correctly put in and they were sent back to the demo "operatives", who then brought them to the elections office. That is your side's word for the repubs, so I will use it.

If the demos forms needed fixing, they had them in their possession and could have done so. Since the numbers should have been printed on repub and demo forms I don't see how anyone can be so offended by this. Two democratic judges STRONGLY agreed, not only rejecting their proposed remedy, but rejecting any remedy at all.

If you think that your guy was treated unfairly by this then I suggest you will have trouble with a lot of life's little issues. Best for you if you get over it, I would think.

Do you beleive that dems would have brought this case or remedy on in areas that had more demo absentee votes than rebubs? That is the smell test you should give this.