SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Selectric II who wrote (23208)12/8/2000 4:09:27 PM
From: Dealer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Did ya change ya mind yet???

I bet the Supreme Court will act quickly on this one.

dealie



To: Selectric II who wrote (23208)12/8/2000 4:10:07 PM
From: CAtechTrader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
I believe the US Supreme Ct. will B@tch slap the Fla. Sp. Ct. on this, esp. with 4 dissents....Title 3 and Equal Protection Issues abound...Judge Sauls Ruling had lots of meat for Federal Appeal of an overturning in it.



To: Selectric II who wrote (23208)12/8/2000 4:13:10 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
no wonder fathers go to FL when abandon child support / jw



To: Selectric II who wrote (23208)12/8/2000 4:38:34 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 65232
 
Situational law.



To: Selectric II who wrote (23208)12/8/2000 4:39:01 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 65232
 
Situational law.



To: Selectric II who wrote (23208)12/8/2000 5:01:04 PM
From: Nick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Here we go again. What a couple hours does to one's confidence!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News