Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (23224)	12/8/2000 4:34:34 PM
From: Selectric II	Respond to of 65232

They have to use the SAME people, or the standards will have changed. In fact, just by virtue of the temporal and circumstance change, the same people might apply different standards. Additionally, by requiring the undervotes in unchallenged and certified counties be looked at at all, the counting standards will have been changed, per se, because the prior, unchallenged standards, were machine standards. If there is one single new vote found, the rules will have changed, putting the FL Supremes' decision in violation of the federal statute, AGAIN. What a frickin' mess. Those four FL Supremes have been out in the sun too long, imho. I'm going to read the dissent, first, which I have a feeling will be a he**uva lot better reasoned than the majority opinion. The 11th Circuit case doesn't ripen so long as Bush is still the certified winner, from my recollection.