Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106067)	12/8/2000 4:54:19 PM
From: maverick61	Respond to of 769670

Kenneth - no - you there is no "equal protection of law" argument because the entire state is being recounted. thats not true - Look at the opinion. They are gonna get slapped down by USSC or 11th circuit. they are INLCUDING 168 votes from Miami Dade partial recount (Democratic precincts) - but NOT counting Rest of Miami-Dade (republican Precincts). Only counting so called undervotes. So this Completely violates equal protection clause

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106067)	12/8/2000 4:54:41 PM
From: PROLIFE	Respond to of 769670

And look at the standard of method of recounting...same old wishy washy Karnac standard.....equal? I doubt it.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106067)	12/8/2000 4:57:40 PM
From: William Brotherson	Respond to of 769670

Are you saying that it is constitutional to include numbers from a recount that had the rules changed three times during that recount as to what made a vote, Broward County, and to add the numbers from only a one percent recount from Miami/Dade? Do you honestly feel that this is an honest and fair interpretation of the legislative intent? I am asking for your honest opinion, not your party lines. wb