Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (121462)	12/8/2000 5:22:46 PM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John, RE: The same could be said for the FL SC. You choose to trust a full time politician rather than a group of Florida's best Judges. The courts are traditionally much less partisan. I dunno. It seems to me that a judge is just a whole lot better at the game, rather than more or less partisan.

To: Road Walker who wrote (121462)	12/8/2000 6:08:22 PM
From: Eric K.	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

John-- Re: You choose to trust a full time politician rather than a group of Florida's best Judges. Actually, all you're trusting is the four junior members of the Florida Supreme Court. I'd suggest you (& the rest of the thread) read the Chief Justice's dissent-- he basically says the rest of the judges will be overturned on equal protection issues for the conflicting standards on what an "undercount" really is, are way overstepping their bounds by politicizing the judiciary, are making a totally unneeded constitutional conflict, and are basically morons. His dissent begins on page 40: cnn.com -Eric