Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stomper who wrote (24323)	12/8/2000 7:26:42 PM
From: Mike E.	Respond to of 49816

Their original ruling that handed back the case for clarification was done in the most magnanimous way The Supreme Court of the United States can do it, and basically the FL Supreme's said "yeah, whatever. We do it our way, you do it yours". If they take an emergency appeal, I would expect them to bitch-slap the Florida Supreme Court...although they could just overturn it without comment, but I find that highly unlikely. ROTFLMAO! You're right, though. The US SC did not reverse their decision, they courteously vacated it and sent it back for clarification. As far as I know the Florida Supreme Court still has not answered the request for clarification and their previous order is still vacated. You just can't pay for this kind of entertainment! <ggg> M