SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles R who wrote (22040)12/11/2000 6:30:23 AM
From: fyodor_Respond to of 275872
 
Chuck: I hope we don't argue too much about this topic - the data out there overwhelmingly supports that current hardware is way ahead of current software. Intel/AMD need the help of new applications to keep the MHz race going.

I agree, but what will the "killer apps" for GHz CPUs be?

Some thoughts...

Speech recognition seems to always pop up when this question is raised, but so far it hasn't made much of an impression on end users - despite the real availability of the technology. It may be that the only way to stimulate demand for speech recognition is by integrating it into the OS.

Video and Image editing is probably my personal short-term favorite. More and more people are buying digital cameras, and (affordable) digital camcorders are just around the proverbial corner. Editing photos and home videos requires some serious number crunching, esp. when combined with the option of adding 3D effects (ala 3D Studio).

Games used to be one of the major driving forces for upgrading PCs in the home. These days, however, graphics cards are a serious bottle neck. Even shelling out many hundreds of dollars for the latest and greatest 3D card doesn't guarantee you relief. When, if at all, will the 3D bottleneck be relieved? The use of embedded DRAM could go a long way, but acceptance among the major players has been slow. NVIDIA has yet to tip its hand on the technology it plans to use in the upcoming NV20 chips (think x-box), but rumors are that they are not using embedded DRAM.

-fyo



To: Charles R who wrote (22040)12/11/2000 6:46:15 PM
From: TimFRespond to of 275872
 
<You wouldn't think that would help but the 500mhz system was a lot faster then the 200mhz pentinum II that I used briefly before I got the new system.>

I hope we don't argue too much about this topic - the data out there overwhelmingly supports that current hardware is way ahead of current software. Intel/AMD need the help of new applications to keep the MHz race going.


I agree. Most current software does not need top of the line hardware. My point was that going from obsolete hardware to modern low end hardware (like I did) helps. Going from 200 or 266 to 500mhz at work was nice. Going from 133mhz to 600mhz at home made a world of difference. Beyond 600-800mhz (current low end) should help with games but not much with most internet content or office applications and even with games the video card is often the bottleneck.

How many people out there are using sub 300mhz machines? My guess is a lot. They are the people who will need to buy new systems.

Tim



To: Charles R who wrote (22040)12/12/2000 1:46:11 AM
From: eplaceRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Charles, Pravin and Kash have both said

that it looks like flash may save the quarter from being a total disaster. I think flash could provide AMD with over 40% of revenues next year if the MP chips don't pick up. Does this latest chain of events change your mind about spinning off flash?

Regards
Ed P.