Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oral Roberts who wrote (5441)	12/9/2000 12:03:14 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6710

I think it's worth noting that in the FL SC hearing that one of the Justices specifically asked both parties whether any the undercount votes that were reviewed and recorded for either Bush or Gore were contested by either party and the response was "No". Hence leading to the decision to include the votes. So it seems that even with all the "in front of the CNN camera" bashing of the standardless process; in fact the intent of the ballot was determined [or divined if you prefer] to the satisfication of all the parties in the Courtroom representing both sides. [I pay more attention to what the parties say in front of the FLSC than what the say in front of a CNN camera.] jttmab