Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: t2 who wrote (23557)	12/9/2000 10:22:09 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

what uniform standard? do dimple chads count? what if no other dimpled chads on same ballot? will a uniform standard be communicated statewide? what if Broward's completed recount does not conform? how to ensure that standard was applied properly? select only the undervoted ballots? how to be certain those ballots havent been tallied already? what if counties have difficulty locating undervoted ballots? how many ballots have changed in nature since Nov7th? have any ballots disappeared since Nov7th? have any new ballots been created since Nov7th? and what if total number of votes differ from certification? what if a county cannot finish by the deadline? what if other court injunctions interfere with progress? what if several counties bring in many examiners who are properly instructed on the uniform standard? is "clear intent of voter" clear to anyone? got any answers to this list of questions? not simple as you suggest they will come to a conclusion with this thing a conclusion with credibility? a conclusion that is legal? a conclusion with any accuracy or reliability? maybe we should have a 3-day court proceeding on standards and ballot integrity ??? this is neither simple nor equitable I am not afraid of hidden Gore votes appearing I am confident of bias and fraud infecting the entire process / jim