Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (8797)	12/9/2000 4:48:53 PM
From: mr.mark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

#reply-14982960

To: DMaA who wrote (8797)	12/9/2000 4:54:30 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

No, I believe those chads on the floor were electrostatically attached to the ballots from the original punching and some (not even all) came lose during the manual counting. That is why the Reps advanced the theory that chads between ballots could create a dimple (of course on Gore's chad location) when large groups of ballots are stacked together (pressure from a chad to deform an un punched chad to be pregnant). You can, of course, hold the theory that handling ballots displaces only Gore's chad, or the conspiracy theory that someone, under the watching eyes of the press and observers, punched those out for Gore. Zeev