Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lawdog who wrote (108449)	12/9/2000 7:13:29 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

Bring it on, bitch. Your crap has no effect on Mr. Mighty Chicken Brains. I think you used to be bigsablepoint and you lied about it. You have no credibility with me. Whatever effluvium you care to type has zero credibility with me. You can blow your bong smoke all over this thread, but your boys have crossed the line now. No more jokes. I stopped the medication in 1978, the same year I switched from Democrat to Republican. Dig this: Your pals Gebhardt and Daley are lying, dishonorable sons of bitches. They lied on national television, and I saw it. Your little rump roast Suzanne Gunzberger manufactured some votes for Al in Broward County. I saw it with my own two large beady reptile eyes. Yuppers. This used to be amusing to me. Now it's not. Let's talk about it rationally, as two adults. Let's talk about the Supreme Court of the United States of America getting into Al's script, here. Ya wanna talk about that? You can start by calling me a nazi again. That should get the ball rolling.

To: lawdog who wrote (108449)	12/9/2000 7:26:12 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 769667

I really don't want to hurt you. You better back to picking on paid touts and other people who are too weak to cause you some permanent damage. Why would you threaten someone like that? TLC enjoys an argument but you go too far. First of all I doubt you are even an attorney, if you are, you certainly don't present yourself well at all. Secondly you are not in a position to hurt anyone. Physically or legally. I also wonder why you might feel it isn't honorable to challenge "paid touts". Your reference of the "touts" not being able to cause him physical damage is clear. You are stating that you could cause that damage. The "permanent damage" you speak of has escalated your threat to a serious level. It is clear what inference a reader is to draw from your post. You are getting closer to the threshold of an actionable offense. Stop! TG