SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave Gore who wrote (108687)12/9/2000 8:40:37 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Dave: I really don't think the Supreme Court Court is hurt by your loss of respect. The feeling would probably be mutual.



To: Dave Gore who wrote (108687)12/9/2000 8:45:37 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Dave, if you had read this, Message 14985657 you wouldn't have bothered to write what you did. As time goes by it will become clearer. Give it some time.



To: Dave Gore who wrote (108687)12/9/2000 8:54:09 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Respond to of 769667
 
"...please understand that I actually prefer Bush for President. I just wanted him to win by winning the recount..."

That sounds more than a little mendacious.



To: Dave Gore who wrote (108687)12/9/2000 9:17:35 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
No, we don't have to live with the law if the law is unconstitutional, or with the result if it's being interpreted and applied in an illegal or unconstitutional manner. The Supreme Court strikes down unconstitutional laws regularly, and reverses unlawful interpretations of lawful laws as well.