Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lawdog who wrote (108769)	12/9/2000 9:26:37 PM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Another reason why the re-re-recount fails to identify the "legal votes".... ABC showed a county which was running the ballots through their machine in an attempt to scan for the undervotes. They found that the total "votes detected" were off from the certified total by sixty. This means that any use of the machine to select undervotes might come up with a lower total of votes found (meaning that undervotes selected out and added to the previous certified total would give some people two votes counted) or a higher total (some don't get their vote counted at all).

To: lawdog who wrote (108769)	12/9/2000 9:30:32 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

That depends on what "counted" means. They have all been run through the counting machines. You know that. We all know that. Have they all had the benefit of the fevered imagination of a biased Democratic Canvassing Board? No. Doesn't look like they will, either.