Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WTSherman who wrote (109025)	12/10/2000 12:37:46 AM
From: RON BL	Respond to of 769667

What he's saying is that because a machine couldn't read them they aren't "legally cast votes"! Incredible logic. Hitler would have loved someone who thought like this And you think that Gore could possibly have any hope of uniting this country. I have never heard Bush call anyone thug or Nazi. You are a vile piece of S%%%%T. You are a fascist and a NAZIS in full uniform

To: WTSherman who wrote (109025)	12/10/2000 1:13:38 AM
From: Shannonb	Respond to of 769667

Actually no, that's what the instructions said. Punch your card and check for mistakes before turning in your vote or it will not be counted.

To: WTSherman who wrote (109025)	12/10/2000 1:16:42 AM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

"What he's saying is that because a machine couldn't read them they aren't "legally cast votes"! Doesn't matter whether they were legally cast or not. They didn't register with the voting machines, then there was a recount. Still didn't register, and the LAW allowed for 4 more days to get selective hand re-counts. Still didn't have enough votes. The FL SC gave Gore TWELVE more days to get the re-counts. Bush wins again. How can you argue that Al should be able to keep counting regardless of any deadlines, particularly when the law allowed for selective re-counts of his choosing? Do you just keep challenging the standards until there are enough votes? Even with the extra time, he SUED the very democratic canvassing boards that had the discretion to choose their methods of counting a vote. Do you honestly believe a fair counting method is the one proposed by an $800/hr lawyer working for the candidate? Is that how you achieve fairness? I would be most interested in your thoughts on any of these points.