SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chomolungma who wrote (5641)12/10/2000 8:00:38 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 6710
 
Re: Roe v. Wade.

I don't think even a conservative court would overturn the decision now, but what
would happen if they did?


I disagree with your scenario.

It would revert back to the states. I strongly doubt that the USSC would say that abortions were unconstitutional per se. They would just say there was no constitutional right to an abortion, and that the issue was a matter of state law. Some states would presumably outlaw abortions (e.g. Utah). Some would presumably allow abortions (starting with California). So the people in non-abortion states would just travel to abortion states, much as people 50 years ago used to travel to Nevada for quickie divorces which were unavailable in their own states.

The Congress would, IMO, not even think about passing a federal bill on this. Let the state legislators take the heat, either way!



To: chomolungma who wrote (5641)12/10/2000 10:19:23 PM
From: ThirdEye  Respond to of 6710
 
chomo, I don't think overturning Roe v Wade means abortion becomes illegal. States can still permit it.

BTW, which peak does your name refer to? K-2?