Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should George W. Bush Concede? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: coug who wrote (373)	12/10/2000 1:03:55 PM
From: bosquedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 554

Not clear where the bouncing ballots will finally land.

To: coug who wrote (373)	12/10/2000 1:33:52 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 554

Hi coug, I agree with your post, well stated... I think Baker and the rest of those croneys are losers, they didn't do a very good job when they were in office with George's father or his father would have won another term... so, George II is starting with a bunch of losers... besides, you would think that Cheney would wear a tie without stains all over it when appearing on national television..... I agree, the markets are much bigger than any political party... I also think these markets are super sensitive to even the most irrelevant things sometimes, this is why it could work lower due to any political uncertainty despite the fact that it really ought to be working higher... I fully expect these markets to move higher at some point when it realizes it was moving lower in error.....<g> GZ