Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (37795)	12/10/2000 6:57:34 PM
From: Challo Jeregy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42787

In my believes I was thinking that those sitting in their chairs for life will take a neutral view on polarizing political disputes, only to be deeply dissapointed. Haim, I realized how political the Supreme Court is when the Democratic party fought so hard to keep Justice Robert Bork and Justice Clarence Thomas out of it. Both are honorable men. I am Republican, so I know you and I are on opposite sides of this. That being said, the future Supreme Court appointees are one big reason that I voted for Bush. Neither Gore nor Bush will be able to push much of their agendas thru Congress. But those appointees are very important, as witnessed even now by what is going on. By the way, Bush Sr. was a fair man. He appointed Souter to the Supremes, who is a pretty liberal guy. I think Bush Sr. was disappointed. <g> I want Bush to win. I greatly fear a Gore presidency.