Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (109627)	12/10/2000 2:43:29 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

"A hundred years from now the arguing will still be going on." My feeling is that as this case gets analyzed over the next year or two that the tide will shift to a more conservative interpretation of the law that is more in line with the majority of the US SC. It will be bad for the dems imo because when you take the emotion out of it people will see that the ultimate ruling was indeed fair, and based on the laws on the book at the time of the election. Also, when all of the rhetoric from this period is analyzed I think that the comments of Bush and Baker will seem pretty tame compared to the hatred and lies spewed by Jackson, Wexler, Daley, Gore, etc. I challenge you or anyone to show where Bush has lied to the American public regarding this fiasco OR changed his position on this. I can name a few times for Gore. If you would like we can have a contest.