Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (3646)	12/10/2000 3:20:49 PM
From: Dave Gore	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3887

Brian, the plain fact is that the U.S. Supreme Court did not follow Florida Law in granting their stay. FLORIDA LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR AN EQUAL STATEWIDE STANDARD. How can the U.S. Supreme Court therefore stop the count based on lack of an "equal standard"? That is flat out wrong. Perhaps some other reasons I could have understood, but not that one cited by some members that swung the vote. I am focusing on the Supreme Court of the land which made a dispicable and illegal ruling for granting a stay. Maybe the FL Supreme Court ruling is suspect. Maybe Bush deserves to be President. Maybe he would make a better President. But all that is beside the point. The Supreme Court of the land should not overturn a ruling, even if a bad one, by miscontruing Florida law and saying their needs to be an equal standard applied. FLORIDA LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR AN EQUAL STATEWIDE STANDARD. How can the U.S. Supreme Court therefore stop the count based on lack of an "equal standard"? I am arguing law, not politics. That is something you are too biased to do or understand.