Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should George W. Bush Concede? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (391)	12/10/2000 3:20:22 PM
From: Jack Colton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 554

Yah... but if asked, I bet he'll know how to spell "Potato."

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (391)	12/10/2000 3:30:38 PM
From: LoneTrader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 554

I feel so sad it's the principle that Gore stand behind will lost him the presidency. The two federal judges that he named in his campaign will be the deciding votes, it all comes to that! Don't be so innocent! The tobacco states that G. W Bush endorsed all went to Bush! While Bush can sign the law of hand re-count in Texas, but he does not dare to count the Flda vote. I do not know what kind of principle he stands behind. But you know what, he always can cry to his grand father --- the Fed. high court! Why should we tolerate this?