SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: QwikSand who wrote (38868)12/10/2000 4:13:14 PM
From: cfimx  Respond to of 64865
 
>>The clear intent of the blurb on the website was to hide from the reader ML's dismissal of the "concerns", and in fact to heighten them by saying that someone "familiar" with something had directly told AmercanInvest about a pending SUNW warning which of course never happened.

mr consipiracy, did u ever think the blurb was just "poorly written?" hey it happens. these aren't yet woodward and bernstein.

qwik, 12 people went to that site and read it. 13 counting you. that represents buying power of 3,000 shares. qwik C H I L L. it was one day. suncom will be up tomorrow because it HAS to be up (it wouldn't LOOK good if it wasn't) so chin up. you can be HAPPY again in less than 24 hours.

like is said suncom will be up more on monday than it was down on friday. no more tears people!!!!



To: QwikSand who wrote (38868)12/10/2000 4:23:41 PM
From: Bob Kim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
QS, I didn't take away from the link that ML had any association with the comment about a warning.

The analyst's only real comment on the rumors was repeating what he heard from the company. He didn't outright say they were true or false. He essentially suggested that he did not have the same concerns.