Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Trading the markets..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mephisto who wrote (1676)	12/10/2000 6:10:34 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4583

I think the substance of those posts are no more than conjecture about what the voter may or may not have intended... that would be no different than making philosophical guesses about how many teeth a horse may or may not have in his mouth... after all is said and done, the best and most empirical way to find out how many teeth the horse actually has is to open the horses mouth and count the teeth themselves... this is what the USSC has stopped, the direct observable and empirical counting of those teeth... now, if the voter didn't vote, it would clearly show as a chad totally left alone, and if the voter did indeed poke through the chad, it would show something... as long as those questionable ballots remain uncounted, there will remain that looming and pervasive cloud of doubt about the ethical ligitimacy of either of those two candidates claiming the moral high ground and ultimate victory.....IMHO GZ