Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abuelita who wrote (34317)	12/10/2000 9:34:37 PM
From: robwin	Respond to of 35685

Hi Rose, I saw the RMBS post too...he reminds of a investment service i used back in the 80's...always made these pie in the sky claims but if you read in between lines, there was always a little wiggle room...in his case, he doesn't bother when he is blatantly wrong, he just picks another stock...LOL.. Just Porchin' Rob

To: abuelita who wrote (34317)	12/10/2000 11:18:20 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

LOL, Rose & Rob ... indeed. Well, what would we expect from one who seems to be obsessed with controlling the trades -- and lives -- of other people? On his special "Porch?" <snicker> BUY --- BUY --- BUY ---rrrrrrrrrrrrRMBS! All the way down from $115. I posted here two months or so ago that I thought RMBS was extremely risky, because of lawsuits, and that I was selling my position, FWIW, at the time. Or now. Voltaire, meanwhile, shouted to the 'heavens' <g> that it would SOAR to $200 by year-end. The pitiful fact of the matter is that this stock quavers around $50. I hate to think how many people have lost money listening to the man -- specifically recos to buy Jan 01 calls. Then March. Then May. Worthless, so many will expire. But, hey! That's probably what makes me a Democrat! The fact that I even consider the lives of other people besides myself. Silly, 'emotional' liberal that I am. <g> 'b-i-a' ###