Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chic_hearne who wrote (46017)	12/10/2000 11:53:56 PM
From: Lucretius	Respond to of 436258

sounds liek a reasonable approach

To: chic_hearne who wrote (46017)	12/11/2000 1:15:11 AM
From: Spekulatius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<I fully expect half this thread to get wiped out with the rest of the Clowns before all is said and done. >> Chic- Be careful or you might end up being in the wrong 50%. We are in the market to make money, not to be right. Shorting stocks is very dangerous and buying options very expensive. Be aware that the odds are against you when you buy puts or short stocks. A NASDAQ at 600 is very very unlikely, IMHO.

To: chic_hearne who wrote (46017)	12/11/2000 7:28:38 AM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<<It will be a fight between you and I who is the biggest bear on SI other people have posted predictions of a nas at 600. i do not believe that half this thread will go long although they may buy selectively. buying a micro cap stock like vaso for example at, oh 2 or 3 bucks, would be different than buying into the qqq. and if 'half the thread' went long with 10 % of their assets after making money on the short side, they'd only be playing with house money anyway. ps keep an eye on your ego dood...