SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Nehrboss who wrote (86615)12/11/2000 2:04:14 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 132070
 
>>I wand Dems to be intellectually honest too, and if they say let's discern the will of all voters, than these have to count.<<

thanks for the data. btw, did any gore voters do the same? was gores name on second page (can't imagine it was). you know how both parties only tell you what benefits their own selfish interests.

yes, if the fl supreme court feels that partial recounts are now legal when the pre-election laws said they were not, they could find it in their hearts to include these ballots.

the 4 "justices (loose term) are beginning to look like the "all katherine harris team."



To: Richard Nehrboss who wrote (86615)12/11/2000 12:27:51 PM
From: benwood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Richard,

Presumably Gore was on the same page as Bush on that ballot, right, probably right under Bush? If so, how many voted for Gore and then wrote him in on page two as well? I'm sure the GOP doesn't have a corner on Samsonite <g>.

Those people who both voted for a candidate and then wrote him/her in should be thankful the IRS didn't prepare their ballot. <ggg>

--Ben

p.s. were those ballots supposed to be from Florida, too?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News