Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (110139)	12/11/2000 9:01:50 AM
From: sunshadow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

"Can you point to continuing or current actions that specifically target military ballots?" Ellen, here is your answer... "The decision was immediately appealed to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, said Roger Bernstein, a lawyer representing six of 13 individual Democratic voters who brought the suit. He said a request had been made for oral argument Monday." ******************************************************* TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A federal judge Saturday refused to throw out about 2,400 overseas ballots, most of them cast by military personnel, that were received up to 10 days after the Nov. 7 election. The decision was immediately appealed to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, said Roger Bernstein, a lawyer representing six of 13 individual Democratic voters who brought the suit. He said a request had been made for oral argument Monday. Republican George W. Bush received 1,575 votes among the contested ballots, compared with 836 for Democrat Al Gore. The difference is more than enough to change the outcome of the election. The suit claimed state and federal laws as well as the U.S. Constitution require all ballots to be received by the close of the polls on Election Day and provide no exception. Florida's administrative code, however, requires election officials to count ballots mailed on or before election day as long as they are received within 10 days after the election. U.S. District Court Judge Maurice Paul found the 10-day rule should be considered the equivalent of a federal court order although it was adopted as part of a consent decree between the state and federal governments rather than a court order. Although the Florida Legislature failed to put the extension in law, it "was fully involved in attempting to enact statutes to satisfy the federal decree.'' Paul also noted federal officials have known Florida and seven other states allow the post-election acceptance of ballots and yet have sued none of them. "Congress did not intend ... to impose irrational scheduling rules on state and local canvassing officials and certainly did not intend to disenfranchise voters whose only reason for not being able to have their ballots arrive by the close of election day is that they were serving their country overseas,'' Paul wrote.

To: Ellen who wrote (110139)	12/11/2000 11:36:39 AM
From: H-Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

They have gone to court or filed briefs against the plaintiff's in each of the 4 counties. And your good buddy Al has yet to speak out against the effort to eliminate these ballots in the first place. O his surrogates have said this and that. Not a word from Al. And Ms. Harris's mistake does not come close to excusing him. The intent was all too clear, rathter than letting the canvassing boards go their natural course, he intervened in the most cyncical of ways.