Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Street who wrote (336)	12/11/2000 9:40:46 AM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 644

Hi TS - thx for the article. Actually, it is not true. The issue was dated back to 1996. Statistically, there are strong indications that the newer the polling machinery, e.g., touch screen, the better the acceptance rate. It is only obvious. That said, crying over spilled milk is indeed a meaningless exercise. One cannot undo this election year. Maybe that is why the Gore camp doesn't try to do anything about it [overvote,] even though some democrats keep crying foul. To the latter, that is fate. They should focus on the reform. I do not agree with the central premise of the article. According to some rumor, the Miami-Dade recount of the undervote on Saturday actually favored Gov Bush. Of course, I can understand why the Bush camp doesn't want to take that chance. However, they shouldn't slam everyone who doesn't agree with them as fraud perpetrator. I am not even a democrat, but I like to see fairness prevails. Since the GOP tactics is if-you-are-not-with-me-you-are-against-me, am I part of the conspiracy <VBG>? My beef is that they are painting the majority of people who want fairness as democrat sympathizer best, Bosco