Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (61912)	12/12/2000 2:25:22 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116752

GNN asks How can it B when 2 B cannot B based on B&B ??? This is a Gata Nut News Special Notification of Unverified Information of Uncertain Origin heard through the Gata Grape Vines You who is reading this has most likely already ask a question and as of yet received no answer. Yes, the question most often asked by those reading my posts is one of why the heck do i continue reading this guy's post when all he does is his gata nut routine. I agree somewhat, but then i have no choice but to read my posts since they appear onto my computer screen as they are written. Well, actually not since i type with two fingers when i do speed typring and one when i do normal speed typing, and in both cases i need to look at the keyboard for each key needed to press as their location remains a mystery to me. Still reading this? Then congratulations to Bill Murphy as he has skillfully put into place a means that his message is placed onto this GPM thread. As usual i have folks doing loops d loops in tring to following my initial post focus, causing much dizzyness and yes even that requiring a barf bag, so here was where i once was. "How can it B when 2 B cannot B based on B&B ???" B&B = Bob & Bird a.k.a. no evil/criminal manipulation With the additional comment from TheBird that something that does not exist cannot be proven either way. Which make me wonder how deBird can qualify something, which he says does not exist. Its as if a part of it does exist while the whole of it does not exist. So in that texture, the following. Once Upon aTime - a rumored true short story [Start.] "I just returned from a bite to eat with a highly respected London based financial man who is well known in European banking circles." "This particular gentleman is a GATA advocate. One of his contacts is a higher up at the Bank of England and my friend asked this BOE individual to what extent was the BOE responible for their decision to sell half of England's gold." "The BOE man reply was ZERO." "He told my friend it was rammed down their throat by the UK Treasury." "My colleague also recently dined with Larry Lindsey, Harvard trained economist, who is in the running to be the new Treasury Secretary if Bush wins." "It was a dark and gloomy full moon night while at a small dinner party he spoke with Lindsey for two hours and brought up GATA's claims to him." "The response was a general one and not gold specific." (this is not a quote, but as I understand what he said): "Certain people will go to jail as result of certain goings in recent times in the financial arena." [End.] makes one wonder is B&B 2B or not 2B the question or is these two Bs 2 b questioned? well, as far as i can throw-up sure dougak23 O G I C A B P U C A B P Y A B P R U A B