Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: martin001 who wrote (46172)	12/11/2000 2:01:27 PM
From: jj_	Respond to of 436258

hard to call...the key topic seems to be different standards...Sandra Day Oconnor is the minimum swing...she's drilling Boise on different standards... my 2 cents; -there will be no Gore win -either Bush win or -recount with no dimples... my bet is Bush win because of time factor/standards...

To: martin001 who wrote (46172)	12/11/2000 2:03:06 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 436258

Like I said -- Fla SC really screwed up. Had they addressed the remand first we wouldn't be in the pickle we are in now ... >>U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, whose vote is considered by many observers to be crucial to the hopes of Democrat Al Gore, said today she was troubled by the Florida Supreme Court's decision allowing recounts in the showdown between Gore and Republican George W. Bush. "I did not find a real response by the Florida Supreme Court to this court's remand," O'Connor told Gore attorney David Boies during a 90-minute hearing. "It just seemed to kind of bypass it ... and I find that troublesome." <<