Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Fowler who wrote (3912)	12/11/2000 2:21:33 PM
From: Si_Detective	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57684

Opinion from other poster, I agree 100% and cash in some of my trading stocks. "My working theory at the moment is that the Court constructs a remedy that directs the Florida Sec of State to develop a standard for manual counts. That would both achieve the Court's political goal (giving Bush the presidency) and allow the Court to avoid making bad law (usurping the role as final arbiter of Fla law, abusing the Equal Protection clause). I find it hard to imagine that the Court would simply shut down the process entirely -- both because that level of political intervention would be highly unusual and disconcerting, and also because the Court could only give Bush an outright win on legal foundations that the Court should find highly undesirable. It would trample the principle of states' rights if it overruled the Fla Supreme Court on matters of Fla law. It would risk making the entire Fla election unconstitutional if it ruled that the manual recounts were unconstitutional because they violate the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. All of this is to say -- as the market yet again prices in a clean Bush win, be cautious, because it seems unlikely to me that the decision will impose finality on the process."