Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should George W. Bush Concede? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (471)	12/11/2000 2:42:04 PM
From: sandeep	Respond to of 554

I listened to the arguments also. I thought there were some good points raised. Now onto your message. 1) Machines are objective since they treat both candidates in the same way. There is no argument about that, even from the Gore side. Your suggestion of apportioning "rejected votes" via a percentage is silly. It seems that you want to disrespect the rights of a voter who doesn't want to vote for president because he doesn't like any of the candidates. 2) Butterfly ballot is a separate issue. People who couldn't read the ballots properly should have asked for help, they abrogated their responsibility and nothing can be done about that. It is not at issue in this case. 3)The idea of revoting in a single county is ridiculous. Your arguments give me a hard time with your assumed sanity.