Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (129484)	12/11/2000 2:32:11 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 1579860

Actually I now agree with you about counting the undervotes statewide. However, to make it fair, all other hand recounts should be not counted as these were either not completed or were done with different standards. Not that this is totally fair but like you said, it might give some legitimacy to the election. On the other hand it wouldn't be as fair as just using the machine count state wide rather than just hand counting undervotes only. The other alternative is hand count the whole state. Are you aware there are some "overvotes" now in question in Martin county where is was possible to determine the will of the voter quite easily? But the FLSC decision didn't say to count them. My guess is that the USSC will say either: hand recount the whole state on a standard or just let the 2nd machine count stand. Which do you like? <G> Jim