To: Dave Gore who wrote (110731 ) 12/11/2000 3:11:10 PM From: Valley Girl Respond to of 769669 Actually, I think their real problem, assuming they decide to allow the recounts to proceed, will not be what the standard should be, but what basis in law there is for setting one from the bench. Same problem the FL SC ducked. FYI, re. 12/12 and 11:57, note that the deadline is tonight at midnight (at least, that's what was quoted in the press). Also, for those who've asked about whether 12/12 is the "real" deadline or not, it is only if the existing slate of Bush electors is not invalidated by court action prior to midnight tonight. That's because they are immune to challenge in the US Congress if certified prior to that date. If the deadline passes and there is no slate remaining certified , then any new slate can be appointed prior to 12/18 and still be accepted by Congress, though they are now open to challenge in those bodies. There thus seem to be only the following outcomes possible: 1. The currently-certified Bush electors remain standing at midnight, and it's over for Gore no matter what happens later. 2. The currently-certified Bush electors are blown away, and a hasty completion of some portion of the recount finishes by midnight, gives the election to either Gore or Bush, and is certified by Harris & Jeb, at which point it's over for the loser (if I were Jeb I'd be conveniently lost in the Okeefenokee swamp from now 'till midnight!). 3. There are no electors certified as of midnight tonight and slate(s) arising from either action by the FL legislature or a completion of the manual recount (or both!) are certified by the 18th. The result is open to challenge in congress (guaranteed if there's more than one slate). 4. There are no FL electors certified by the 18th and, um, does this mean Gore wins or does it go to the house? (Very unlikely since the legislature will certainly name a slate of Bush electors to prevent this, but presumably this, too, could be challenged in court by Gore.)