Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (110877)	12/11/2000 4:15:50 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The court rulings will establish what is fair. The ballots can only fuel speculation, which is why they should not be used in the first place.......... Jeepers, just look at what you wrote. The ruling of a narrowly divided court with a bribed judge and a clueless sidekick are more fair than the actual ballots used in the election. Not only is the fix in, but you must think the whole country is really really stupid. You know, some of the folks on this thread probably are that stupid while many others are duplicitous. TP

To: Neocon who wrote (110877)	12/11/2000 4:59:09 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

The court rulings will establish what is fair. The ballots can only fuel speculation, which is why they should not be used in the first place.......... Hope you didn't mean that the way it sounds. If ballots should not be used, why do we even bother to vote? This raises another question: How can the law or a law determine who the people wished to win? The court ruling, hopefully, will be fair and just but it will be a ruling of law. The ruling will show who 'won' the legal battle but not, literally, who won the election.