Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brutusdog who wrote (111056)	12/11/2000 5:40:16 PM
From: kvkkc1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Why don't you explain the alternative. Flapjack might warn you of inciting violence.knc

To: brutusdog who wrote (111056)	12/11/2000 5:42:16 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I am in favor of what causes the least mischief. If I thought you were correct in your assessment, I would change my mind. I will think about it, but it is doubtful I will change my mind.....

To: brutusdog who wrote (111056)	12/11/2000 6:16:46 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 769670

So what is the alternative? Revolution? How about: In the next week (hopefully, maybe as a result of the USSC decision) a President is chosen who serves his 4 years. Maybe he "should" have won, maybe not. Meanwhile, we fix the problem - -we come up with a reliable system of counting votes that is (nearly) tamper-proof. (If the politicos will let us; I suspect many of them are not in favor of a system they cannot twiddle.) Then we have another election. While I prefer Bush, I could live with Gore for 4 years and oust him in 2004. What's wrong with that? Or do you prefer blood in the streets and Americans killing Americans on a large scale?