Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (122168)	12/11/2000 7:02:33 PM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 186894

Joe, Since you are the standard of objectivity, I take your rebuke very seriously. Scumbria

To: Joe NYC who wrote (122168)	12/11/2000 7:42:26 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

Joe, re: "The standard on the books prior to the elections was no dimples. They switched to the more liberal one of accepting dimples in some cases. I think they can make a reasonable case that their new standard is fair, but still, it is a new standard." The only legislative Florida standard that I know of is either the "intent of the voter" or the "clear intent of the voter". All the rest I think is county stuff, made up after the fact. I really think it's up to the locals to decide, per the legislative scheme. And IMHO, the locals are usually more wise and less partisan than the non-locals, they are generally regular folks that sincerely want to be honest and fair. I don't think either side should fear these people, they are closer to the voter than anyone else. BTW, I think the primary legacy of this election will be that the US Supreme's got involved. It should NEVER have happened. It will have a chilling effect on all future elections. John