SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: No Mo Mo who wrote (46361)12/11/2000 7:59:08 PM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
There has been a lot of buying in Nem and HG



To: No Mo Mo who wrote (46361)12/11/2000 8:00:01 PM
From: re3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
from gold eagle : (you sure you want to be owning gold ? you'd be in the company of people like this :

OKAY WE GOT ACTION ! ! ! Attn: DR. VRONSKY & GATA
(sage) Dec 11, 19:10

Okay, the law suit seems to have gotten action right out of the chute! Yes, the cabal appears to feel threatened! Of course they slammed gold today. If anyone has been following my posts they would know the mental condition of the people who make up the cabal and some of their attributes. And one of those attributes is that the members of the cabal are ill and psychotic and like ALL psychotics they like to inflict pain on people and thus the slamming of gold in the face of the law suit regardless of how this act is eventually explained away. At some point I will gain your trust in this area and you will come to believe my posts because you will have seen enough, I am sure of it.



To: No Mo Mo who wrote (46361)12/11/2000 8:15:36 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
well, first of all i'd like to point out that i disagree with the gold bugs who say 'only physical gold will be any good'. if the downturn turns into an outright deflation, holders of gold stocks will do much better than holders of bullion...see the 1930's for confirmation.

i can't recommend an asset allocation percentage, as standards of prudence vary from person to person...but considering that gold stocks just made 40-year lows in some cases (HM for example) i guess one can err on the side of a heavier-than-usual weighting here.