Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Pueblo who wrote (790)	12/11/2000 9:45:45 PM
From: hobo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6089

grub time to vote for greenspan washingtonpost.com washingtonpost.com

To: Don Pueblo who wrote (790)	12/12/2000 5:04:52 AM
From: LTK007	Respond to of 6089

you too(sarcasm i think put aside)---we are in touchy times---for me,when SC rushed to establish that STAY,it was a shocker for me,and i am sure for Jesse also.Why such anxiousness to stop the count,when it could easily be challenged after the fact. The swiftness of the STAY and immediately overiding the Atlanta appeals court refusal to stop count,went over badly with me. Scalia's opinion expressing that he believed this vote count could cause the applicant(Bush) severe damage,and that damage being that it would not be good for the future president(Bush) to have a vote standing that might show him as not the winner in Florida,just had a repressive ring,imo.max p.s. i would think the best solution now would be to send it back to Florida SC and require that they set a uniform standard for counting the undervote,rather than crushing the the vote count outright.(but i think the worst case is likely,they just crush it,now) Whatever,Dershowitz(love him when he is on my side,and blowing steam off when he is against me),has promised us scandals down the road on all this--we will see.max