Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (122198)	12/11/2000 9:58:01 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

Re: "Are you really so dense that you can not understand that the undervotes, rejected by the machines, have never been examined to find "legal votes" that express a "clear of the voter" ??" Please don't start insulting or I will have to return the favor by pointing out how ignorant you are of Judge Saul's ruling. The ruling pointed out the fact that the Gore team had the burden to prove there were legal votes in those undervotes. Nation wide the undervote averages 2%. In Florida the average was 1.9% yet in this case there were only 1.6% undervotes. This fell well within the expected numbers and so they failed to prove any irregularities or present any reason to believe these undervotes were anything other than a true no vote. With no proof of rejection of legal votes, there was no legal basis for a handcount. So please stop calling other people dense when it appears you are unfamiliar with the ruling. EP