Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommy Hicks who wrote (111356)	12/11/2000 10:09:32 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

If it was up to me I would say single dimples should count for everyone providing there isn't another chad for the same office fully punched out (then count the one fully punched out) or if the voter didn't write something on his ballot to indicate he wanted to vote for someone else besides the dimpled chad. I don't see how a mark from a stylus could get on a card with no other marks for the same office unless the voter intended to vote for that candidate. I think it should be clear that if a chad is only dimpled that the mark was made by a stylus otherwise the dimple shouldn't count. I think Gore and the rest of the democrats in Florida would be glad to recount under your rules though.