SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff Leader who wrote (86686)12/12/2000 12:16:08 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
It's not certain that Gore would win, especially with a very strict standard, but it's still likely imho. Remember that rejected ballots tend to come disproportionately from inner city districts that have old voting machines and didn't have ballot-checking equipment that told voters whether their ballots were readable or not.



To: Jeff Leader who wrote (86686)12/12/2000 12:38:13 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 132070
 
jeff, it is a travesty when a nice idea is trampled by brutal facts ;-)

i agree. this election was too close to call. gore knows it. why do you think he didn't take the high road? he didn't want to risk losing.

how someone can be sick of bush's clear entitlement feeling while not seeing that gore is up there (more, imho, but i could be wrong) is beyond my comprehension.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News