Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mst2000 who wrote (111516)	12/12/2000 6:31:16 AM
From: jcky	Respond to of 769670

Dude, You are totally clueless if you believe static photography is able to capture a three dimensional "dimple" or indentation or scratch. I'm not talking about hanging chads or perforations. I'm talking about "dimples". As an exercise of logic, why don't you take a piece of paper, or better yet, obtain some ballots and create some dimples or indentations yourself. Now take pictures of the front and back of the ballot with the "dimples" and tell me that you can discern the depth of the dimple. Next, take pictures of the front and back of an unaltered ballot and compare with the pictures of the dimpled ballot. Of course, I'll spare you the trouble and tell you that you can't tell any differences because it's impossible to gauge depth unless you also have a side picture of the ballot, which isn't going to happen. Hasn't it occurred to you why the vote counters in Broward, Palm Beach or Miami/Dade Counties were viewing the front, back and side of the ballots? Regards,