Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (122235)	12/12/2000 2:49:23 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"I agree they didn't feel comfortable with that. Boise argument was that there is no equal treatment across the state (or for that matter the nation) because of the differing voting systems." When they asked Boise what the standard should be it really stone-walled him. He had to be careful. Basically he said that "voter intent" was the standard. Sounded like the USSC read that as way too loose a standard, basically no standard. They could end it here or pass the buck back to the state to find a standard and recount. If they do the latter it will likely end up back in the USSC on the fairness of the standard. Now that I've had time to think about it, I doubt they will offer a standard. Jim